Saturday, October 20, 2012

News Update

NEWS UPDATE Wednesday 7th November 2012

MEETING: Regarding possible development in Rags Valley.

A meeting has been arranged between Cllr Paul Seeby and Save Cheshunt on 22nd November 2012, at the Borough Offices, 7:00pm. Everyone concerned about the possibility of a housing development in Rags Valley are welcome to attend.


Wednesday 31st October 2012
Cllr Seeby has kindly replied giving possible dates regarding a meeting. If you would like to attend the meeting  I would be grateful if you could kindly advise me of the best time and date that would suit you. I intend getting back to Cllr Seeby on Monday 5th November with a date and time for a meeting, if you could kindly contact me, via email, before then. His email:

Charles  Walker  has  no   more  surgeries   this   year  at   the  Rosedale  Free  Church.  However   he  does  have  a  surgery  at   the  Waltham  Cross   Conservative  Club  from  9.30 to  11.00 am  on the  17th of  November   if  that  date  and  time  is  ok    I   can  fix  up  a  appointment  with   Charles  . if  not  we  could  meet  any  evening  on   the  week  beginning  the  19th   November   but  you  may  like  to   know  that  on  the  22th  of that  week  Goff's  Oak  West  Cheshunt  has  it's  neighbourhood   forum  at   7.pm  at  the  Borough  Offices   so  we could   meet  after  the   forum   or  on  the  other  dates  which  I  have  put  forward  at  the  Borough  Offices   please   note   that   anyone   can   attend  this  forum   all  the  best  Paul  Seeby

Sunday 28th October 2012
Reply to Cllr Seeby's email:
Many thanks for your prompt reply. I've sent an email out to other supporters of Save Cheshunt asking if they would like to attend a meeting; I would certainly like to speak to you. Perhaps it would be best if you state a date, time and location that's easiest for you.

Thursday 25th October 2012.
Reply, via email, from Councilor Paul Seeby:

Thanks Julie I do not feel the land adjacent to Rags Lane ,Peakes Way and Cowles known as Rags Valley is the best place for housing and would welcome a meeting on this subject cllr Paul Seeby

Wednesday 24th October 2012
Reply from Rosedale Councilor.
The following reply was received, via email, today from our local Councilor.

Hi Julie,

Many thanks for the email, I am happy always happy to keep residents informed.

Kind Regards

Cllr Dee Hart


Tuesday 23rd October 2012.
Location Name.
We have been endeavoring to discover the official name of the land adjacent to Rags Lane, Peakes Way and Cowles. The website old maps gave us the answer. We were aware the Cowles area of Rosedale was built on a nursery. A recent map showing the estate gives the name of the current field as part of "Burton Grange Nursery." Older maps, prior to World War Two, show the same name. There is a modern nursery to the west of the land that could cause confusion when referring to the location.

Monday 22nd October 2012.
An email was forwarded to Flamstead End Councilors Paul Seeby and Dolores Hart. (I believe Rosedale is covered by these Councilors?) The following was sent:

Developers / Land Agents have taken an interest in land adjacent to Rags Lane, Peakes Way and Cowles. We would be grateful if you could kindly inform us of any official announcements/changes Borough of Broxbourne may make regarding said location. Please see our website. Contact can be made via email or preferably our news blog.

Tuesday 16 October 2012. We contacted political parties regarding rampant
Roger Hayes of The British
Constitution Group and
Lawful Rebellion.
Robin Tilbrook of the
English Democrats Party.
development in West Cheshunt. We contacted: "English Democrats," "Cheshunt and Waltham Cross Labour Party", "UKIP" and even though they are not a political party "Lawful Rebellion."  We didn't contact the Conservative party as  we have written to Charles Walker MP. We got an extremely prompt response from the "English Democrats" and also "Lawful Rebellion" To date, we still await a reply from the others.

Replies from the "English Democrats" and "Lawful Rebellion, their item is: Abolish Council Tax" can be seen below or press the link opposite.

Monday 15 October 2012. A Letter was sent to Charles Walker MP regarding planning. Please see below or press the link opposite to view the letter. To date we still await a reply.

Borough of Broxbourne Planning.
Early October Broxbourne Planning were contacted. We were told the area of land is currently "Green Belt." The government will soon be releasing areas of Green Belt for development, so its designation may change within the March 2013 Local Plan. We were also told Broxbourne Planning have received several "Representations" regarding that land from Developers and Land Agents. Somebody has gone to a lot of expense to pay for four surveyors on site for the best part of a day, for a proposed building development that at this stage is just a whim?


We have a good chance of success with the latest development threat as we have got in early. Also people are now better informed, thanks to the Internet, and have a good idea what is really going on.We will endeavor to keep you  informed with regular news updates and please remember you can leave comments on this blog.



Friday, October 19, 2012

Abolish Council Tax.

Save Cheshunt is non-political, even so we do have open debate as planning has a lot to do with politics. We endeavor to remain impartial.

A Personal View by Peter Croft

  We are led to believe Council Tax goes towards funding local authorities whose departments, such as planning, are supposed to be working in the interests of local residents. The evidence we see around us, especially regarding planning consent, I believe, proves this is not the case. Planning consent appears to be more to do with money than anything else. Please don't blame council staff. They are equally victims of this as we are. Most council staff are very polite and helpful, it's not their fault. I'm talking about high level policy decisions, the people you don't see, that we pay for in our taxes!  

At one time Council Tax was called “Community Charge” but I believe what you pay has little to do with the community and everything to do with deception! Council tax isn't a tax! We are led to believe it is, but in reality the yearly bovine excrement literature the council sends us is in fact a cunningly worded contract! The councils' legal team would probably sever an artery to prove it’s not a contract, but it is! Roger Hayes proved it in court! In law a contract is negotiable and that’s precisely what he does! For more information please see video below. About twenty minutes into his lecture, Roger Hayes talks about Council Tax. 


In much the same way as income tax is not for the common good neither is council tax. It’s simply an integral part of fuelling an extremely corrupt usury scam that enslaves us whilst making a handful of fraudulent banker’s mega rich. The scam has been in operation since the founding of The Bank of England in 1694 and relies upon ignorance of the populous to survive. The mass media’s main news source is Reuters News agency; the agency is owned by the bankers, need I say more! 

Recently Iceland told the IMF to take a hike.  Senior politicians were arrested on charges of fraud. Iceland now prints its own debt free currency, as this country should do! Iceland went from bust to boom almost overnight and continues to prosper without the shackles of the usury scam. Nobody lost their home due to mortgage default and the people in power are there to improve the lives of the populous, not impoverish them as successive governments have done in this country.  Iceland’s economic miracle should be headline news and would be if we actually lived in a democracy. The only area you can find this information is in the alternative news which is also booming. Alternative news such as the The UK Column is one example of many. They have regular live news broadcasts on the Internet, please see below:



People are turning away from conventional media such as the BBC, realising it’s nothing more than propaganda! BBC news is now a laughing stock. They continue to peddle the same myth that this country is in debt. It isn’t! The debt is artificial. 

Every British prime minister is nothing more than an IMF representative whose job is to ensure the scam continues.  No major political party has a policy of issuing debt free sovereign currency. Follow the money trail and who funds them, the reason will become clear. Way back during the American Civil War, Abraham Lincoln printed debt free currency called “The Greenback.” The country boomed, that was until he was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, Tony Bliar’s wife’s great, great, great grandfather! The Greenback was then hastily withdrawn and the people were subsequently impoverished by usury. Kennedy was about to issue debt free currency when he was assassinated. The notes had been printed but were never issued.

Next time a jolly nice politician knocks at your door at election time ask them just one question: “Why can’t this country issue its own debt free currency?” They will look at you as if they have just been touched up! At that point they will either say “It won’t work” whilst making a hasty retreat or go into “Duplicator” mode. This is where they regurgitate the type of economic waffle that is seen nightly on the BBC (British Bias Corporation), that’s designed to give people chronic depression! I’m joking. Seriously, none will give you a straight honest answer, because they can’t!

Westminster continues to lie to us. We have our incomes drained from us in taxes and live in a constant crash and boom war based economy. Deliberate unchecked mass immigration is allowed so as to bring about a controlled society that's based upon the former Soviet Union. The evidence is overwhelming and an accepted fact among academics and people that have studied the subject. The birth count of the indigenous population has continued to drop since 1963. The population boom is artificial. The indigenous population and immigrants, we are both equally victims of a hidden agenda. Without an artificial population boom there would be no need to cover Britain with eyesore developments. Several decades ago it was estimated it would take a generation to correct the damage that had been done. Now it is estimated it will take three generations to correct the horrendous damage. Indigenous and immigrant, it's essential we all stand shoulder to shoulder, find the facts and peacefully and lawfully expose the truth. We have both been duped. What the hidden social engineers and psychopath cronies that rule us fear most is exposure. Once their crime is exposed, it cannot continue.

There is an alternative to the current system that's very simple and has been proven to work.  Have a similar system to Iceland's. Have a debt free currency where inflation is non existent and income tax and council tax are abolished. Essential services would dramatically improve whilst we pay less. Most importantly have democratically elected people in power who work in our best interests, not for a minority of crooked bankers! Political parties would be banned, only accountable individuals could be voted into high office for a fixed term. The way this can happen is we simply vote with our feet and turn our backs on Westminster. Ignore their stupid elections but vote in our own elections. We use our own debt free currency. People will then have a choice, either support Westminster's system of sick lying psychopath rulers. Or support a happy and prosperous society that's based upon freedom and democracy.   I know what my choice is! People throughout the world are beginning to wake up. A similar process is happening overseas. It started in Iceland and the tipping point is being reached in other countries. The most important factor is everything is done peacefully and lawfully. 

For further details please see: http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/





To Return to Save Cheshunt Web Site Please Press Here.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Reply from English Democrats

Save Cheshunt is non-political, even so we do have open debate as planning has a lot to do with politics. We endeavor to remain impartial. So far we have contacted Charles Walker MP (see other blog), The English Democrats, UKIP and the Waltham Cross Labour Party. To date only The English Democrats have responded, this is their reply:

Dear Sir

Thank you for this. The English Democrats are utterly opposed to "Conservative" plans to allow the developers who gave an estimated £6 million to the Conservative Party election campaign to profit at the expense of England's green and pleasant land!

We think that England and the English need a political party standing up for our interests, like the Scottish National Party do for Scotland.

Yours sincerely

Robin Tilbrook
Chairman,
The English Democrats,
Quires Green, Willingale, Ongar, Essex, CM5 0QP
Tel: 01277 896000
Fax: 01277 896050
Mobile : 07778 553395


Blog: http://robintilbrook.blogspot.co.uk/ FaceBook Profile: http://www.facebook.com/robin.tilbrookParty Tel: 0207 242 1066 Twitter: @RobinTilbrookParty Website: www.englishdemocrats.org  

Key facts about the English Democrats
The English Democrats launched in 2002. The English Democrats are the English nationalist Party which campaigns for a Parliament for England, First Minister and Government, with at least the same powers as the Scottish ones within a Federal UK; for St George’s Day to be England’s National holiday; for Jerusalem to be England’s National Anthem; for a Referendum to leave the EU; for an end to mass immigration; for the Cross of St George to be flown on all public buildings in England.
The English Democrats are England’s answer to the Scottish National Party and Plaid Cymru.
The English Democrats’ greatest electoral successes to date include winning the Directly Elected Executive Mayoralty of Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council and this year’s referendum; in the 2009 EU election we gained 279,801 votes after a total EU campaign spend of less than £25,000 (giving the English Democrats by far the most cost efficient electoral result of any serious Party in the UK!)


Monday, October 15, 2012

Letter to Charles Walker MP, Sent 15 October 2012

House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA

Attn: Charles Walker MP



15 October 2012


Dear Sir,

Re: Local Authority Planning, Questionable Impartiality.

Local authorities must constantly seek extra revenue due to the ravages of a usury finance system. Granting planning permission for development generates extra income. Hypothetically if permission were granted for around fifty properties:

  1. The planning process of outline and full planning would generate £17,420 for the authority. A service that, a few decades ago, was free and an integral part of the former rating system that cost residents very little.
  2. Section 106 stipulates a one off fee of £3000 per additional bedroom on new developments, to be paid by the developer.   
  3. Upon completion of properties, additional council tax of an average £1500 per household would generate approximately £75000 pa income for the council.
  4. Broxbourne Services, the privatised part of Broxbourne Council, responsible for profiteering from household waste. An extra 50 properties would be very cost effective.
  5. Local authorities are responsible for generating revenue from car parking charges, issuing parking fines etc. Councils may soon be responsible for profiteering from traffic violations. An increased local population would statistically raise further revenue.
  6. A fair percentage of council tax payment now contributes to council employee pensions. Increasing the local population would raise the pension contribution.
  7. Admittedly with increased population there would be higher overheads but along with this there would be profitable opportunities for areas of council services that have now been privatised.  Hence reason council tax has approximately doubled since 1997 in order to finance the profits of nominated contractors. 

It appears advantageous for local authorities to grant planning permission in order to generate extra income for themselves as well as their nominated sub-contractors. I therefore fail to see how the planning process can be impartial and democratic?

I look forward to your reply,


Yours faithfully without frivolity, ill-will or vexation,